Thu 3 Sep 2009
How to Create a “Soft” and Natural Hairline with Hair Transplantation
Category: FUT (Follicular Unit Transplant) , Graft Orientation , Graft Size , Hair Density , Hair Transplant Surgery , Post Operative ConcernsThis hair loss question was answered by Dr. Glenn Charles of Florida who is a member of the Coalition of Independent Hair Restoration Physicians. His professional answer is below.
One thing I never really understood is when people say that the hairline will soften during the period 6-18 months after a hair transplant. I thought that hairs initially grew thin and thickened up during this same period. If hairs are getting thicker how can the hairline get softer? What does softening of the hairline actually mean?
Creating a soft and natural hairline with surgical hair restoration should be addressed by the hair replacement surgeon during the procedure.
It is critical that the thinner/finer hairs be used in the hairline. Thick/coarse hairs will most likely have a similar look and feel no matter where it is placed. It is true that sometimes transplanted hairs will be more brittle and kinky during its first hair growth cycle. After repeated hair growth cycles and hair cuts those same hairs might begin to look and feel softer, but are probably just finally returning to their original state.
Dr. Glenn Charles, D.O.
—
Bill Seemiller – aka Falceros
Associate Publisher/Editor
Technorati Tags: hair loss, hair transplant, hair restoration, hair replacement, transplanted hairs, hair growth
One of the most important factors that make a hair transplant look natural is a hair restoration surgeon’s ability to create a soft and natural looking hairline that mimics nature. Creating a natural looking hairline involves great skill, placement, artistic design, and hair density.
Most of the factors that we think have to do with “shock loss” of native hair following a hair transplant procedure all take place at the time of hair restoration surgery. The two most important things are: one, the VULNERABILITY of the hairs that exist on top, and two, the AGGRESSIVENESS with which the recipient sites are made. If a large percentage of those remaining native hairs are “miniaturized” (limited length and decreased diameter; ie: “wispy”) they are much more likely to be shocked than a strong terminal hair is. When recipient sites are aggressively made, whether it is the closeness with which they are made or the width, depth, or length of the individual sites, native hairs can be lost either by taking a “direct hit” by the instrument used or simply as a “shock” reaction to having all these cumulative injuries occurring so close to them.
The question of shaving the recipient area (the balding area where hair is to be transplanted) for a hair transplant is a hot issue. Below you will find Dr. Hasson’s comments on why he feels shaving the recipient area is important for optimal results. 