Wed 5 Mar 2008
Why are Some Hair Transplant Surgeons Better Than Others?
Category: FUE (Follicular Unit Extraction) , FUT (Follicular Unit Transplant) , Graft Orientation , Graft Size , Hair Restoration Physicians , Hair Transplant Surgery , Selecting a Hair Restoration Clinic , Session SizesI am a hair loss sufferer considering hair transplantation but I am confused. I have been reading this hair restoration forum for some time and don’t understand what makes some hair transplant clinics better than others. Hair replacement surgery seems like a simple process. Why are some hair transplant surgeons better than others?
There are many ways to answer this question.
Firstly, I don’t think it’s fair to call hair transplantation a “simple” procedure. It’s in fact a very delicate process and damaging the follicular unit grafts without the necessary and proper care is sadly more commonplace than not in the world of hair transplantation.
Keep in mind also that not all hair transplant doctors in the world utilize the latest techniques and technologies. In fact, the majority of them are still using out of date techniques which is why only a handful of hair transplant clinics are recommended on the Hair Transplant Network. Many hair restoration clinics, believe it or not, still refuse to use microscopes when slivering the follicular unit grafts from the strip. Many clinics still use minigrafts. Read more about the history of hair transplantation. And even still, many hair replacement surgeons still use a triple + blade to harvest the strip, which significantly increases hair follicle transection rate.
Keep in mind also that there are variations in even the latest of techniques and technologies.
Some hair transplant physicians prefer making recipient incisions with needles, some with precut flat blades, some with custom cut flat blades, etc. I have personally heard of cases made for each of these hair transplant tools.
Technorati Tags: hair loss, hair transplantation, hair restoration, hair transplant clinic, Hair replacement, hair transplant surgeon, follicular unit grafts, hair transplant doctor, hair restoration clinics, hair follicle transection, hair transplant physician
Most of the factors that we think have to do with “shock loss” of native hair following a hair transplant procedure all take place at the time of hair restoration surgery. The two most important things are: one, the VULNERABILITY of the hairs that exist on top, and two, the AGGRESSIVENESS with which the recipient sites are made. If a large percentage of those remaining native hairs are “miniaturized” (limited length and decreased diameter; ie: “wispy”) they are much more likely to be shocked than a strong terminal hair is. When recipient sites are aggressively made, whether it is the closeness with which they are made or the width, depth, or length of the individual sites, native hairs can be lost either by taking a “direct hit” by the instrument used or simply as a “shock” reaction to having all these cumulative injuries occurring so close to them.
The question of shaving the recipient area (the balding area where hair is to be transplanted) for a hair transplant is a hot issue. Below you will find Dr. Hasson’s comments on why he feels shaving the recipient area is important for optimal results. 
On Monday I had the privilege of watching Dr. Victor Hasson of Hasson and Wong and his staff perform a large 5,119 graft session of Ultra Refined Follicular Unit Grafting from 8 am until 8 pm in Vancouver, Canada. I also met and viewed two patients of 